Sep 24 2007

Always the Penumbra

Published by E. Pontee at 7:27 am under Cross-cultural Perspectives

“World is suddener than we fancy it. / World is crazier and more of it than we think, / incorrigibly plural.”–Louis MacNeice

When I try to fathom the vast hodgepodge of cultures that has come together to define this entity called the United States, I am in absolute awe. There are few more apt descriptions to apply to this country than the aforementioned lines quoted from poet Louis MacNeice’s poem “Snow.” In essence, the entire poem is a contemplation of seemingly impossible juxtapositions, for all the wonder and peril that they entail. What could be more quintessentially American?

Although juxtapositions can create connections, they certainly don’t guarantee the level integration implied by this nation’s default metaphor of multiculturalism: “the melting pot.” Its appeal doubtlessly lies in the suggestion of strength made implicit through its archetypal association with the forge: disparate metals come together to create the stronger amalgam of steel. But like many metaphors, when put up against a careful consideration of the thing it describes, it risks becoming a reductio ad absurdum.

Take for example the case of New York City, arguably one of the most diverse cities on this planet. As a point of civic pride, its denizens (of which I’m a member) will often tout the city’s status as a multicultural bastion. But even in a city as multifaceted as New York, going from one city block to the next can sometimes be a sobering demonstration of people’s proclivity towards living in enclaves that reflect their own particular cultural and/or socioeconomic status. Start out near Columbia University in Morningside Heights and either walk south to the Upper West Side or walk north to Washington Heights and further on to Harlem, then you’ll see what I mean.

Frankly, this complacency about our progressiveness regarding intercultural matters (hardly exclusive to New Yorkers) is the most insidious kind of bigotry, because it fails to acknowledge that resisting bigotry must be an ongoing process of self-education. Just because one eats sushi and owns a Sony PlayStation does not necessarily make one sensitive to Japanese culture. Just because one claims that one African American friend does not necessarily make one a soldier for civil rights. Just because one lives in a multicultural city like New York does not necessarily make one a citizen of the world.

Often, the integration we undeservingly congratulate ourselves for happens on these superficial levels of experience, excepting of course the overriding impetus of dominant Eurocentric culture. The melting pot is a compelling metaphor but ultimately flawed for its odd pairing of naïveté and self-directed jingoism. This is the kind of juxtaposition that doesn’t turn out for the best.

An Eclipse

If I were called upon to construct a metaphor for these United States, I would make use of the “penumbra.” The penumbra is a phenomenon in our everyday lives, but it becomes most dramatically evident in the event of an eclipse. Astronomer’s use the term to define the shadowy border between complete illumination and complete darkness.

What I find so fascinating about the concept is that in essence, the penumbra does not entirely belong to either state but nonetheless is the delineation between the two. The thematic applications are particularly compelling to me as a person whose interests and convictions don’t always take him into the mainstream. Puttering around the outskirts and margins seems like a great way to get some perspective, and maybe in some way contribute to the bigger picture. We don’t get to learn much in those regions of absolute light and dark where everybody tends to say the same thing.

I don’t believe anyone can hold true dominion in thought, expression, or action—thank goodness. Everyone belongs, in their own fashion, to a minority perspective. The very nature of individuality guarantees this. Still, it doesn’t stop us from reaching out to seek a sense of belonging to something larger than ourselves. Minority viewpoints that converge can create amalgams or tensions, and if approached with the proper temperament, we sometimes can discover unexpected regions of great creativity and insights.

As for my own accounting in my plied metaphor of the penumbra, I am a Korean American male, but in many significant ways, that should say nothing beyond the fact. It should not preclude me from reading the works of Irish poet Louis MacNeice or discussing a short story by Mexican-American author Sandra Cisneros. Because I read poetry and fiction should not preclude me from discussing the graphic novel Persepolis by Iranian creator Marjane Satrapi or the The Dark Knight Returns by American creator Frank Miller. Because I have an interest in comics-related media should not preclude me from discussing Turkey’s petitioning to become a member of the European Union or wondering about the costs and benefits of the weakening US dollar in the global market.

We all in our own way live in this tenuous state called the penumbra, and in so doing, try to see the United States in the same way, whose regions of light and darkness often seem to defy all compromise. But we live in it nonetheless and hope we can be the wiser for it.

5 Comments to “Always the Penumbra”

  1. mataroseon 28 Sep 2007 at 11:02 am

    I think the word “penumbra” is far more pragmatic than the so-called “melting pot,” and yet the author does not lose his artistic sensibility– it’s a wonderful metaphor of our current national consciousness which is not so collective these days.

    As for the outskirts of NYC itself, has not Williamsburg been gentrified? (This is just one example coming to mind.) Have the remaining outskirts not become so undesirable that most consider them to “lack culture” than be the source of a remaining uniqueness that has not yet conformed? I live in such an area, and most of what I see is low-grade crime and a disdain from others who are passing through to get to Prospect Park…

  2. kokomjolkon 30 Sep 2007 at 10:56 pm

    Historically, America might have been considered a “great melting pot” but today it is likely closer to a “grand mosaic.” Past generations enthusiastically embraced existing American culture and english language because they wanted to be “American.” Today, ethnic minorities are more likely to also openly retain a good deal of their native cultures. America has become less melting pot or puree, and more of a stew, in which individual ingredients contribute to the overall dish but still retain some of their unique flavors and textures.

    I like the image of penumbra, as defined as “a shadowy, indefinite, or marginal area.” The unfamiliar might just as easily use those same words to describe any number of the many ethnic neighborhoods in New York City.

    I know better and prefer my New York served up as stew.

  3. mataroseon 05 Oct 2007 at 11:52 am

    To respond to kokomjolk,

    I like the idea of stew in New York City, but what about the rest of the U.S.? For instance, in South Texas, where many town are 15 minutes away from Mexico, there seems to be a discrepancy in how life is lived (aka tacos and tamales are ubiquitous as burgers in ALL areas, be they Caucasian or Hispanic) and how life is taught (school used to actually BAN Spanish from being spoken in the halls and classrooms; now it’s merely looked down upon).

    In my experience, it seems that in most of the United States, ethnic enclaves are considered the “bad” parts of town…

    Any thoughts?

  4. kokomjolkon 09 Oct 2007 at 12:52 pm

    To respond to matarose,

    If you like the idea of stew in New York City, then you might agree that a good stew takes time. New York City has stewed many ingredients in the same pot for a good, long while. In contrast, Matamoras, Brownsville, Reynosa, and McAllen function more like a salad bar. People take what they like for their plate, but for the most part, do not mix the ingredients.

    Yes, it does seem that most view ethnic enclaves as “bad” parts of town. Perhaps it is a fear of the unknown, or maybe it just boils down to each individual’s comfort level or “taste.” The optimist in me wants to point out that tastes change. Many of the foods and beverages we enjoy are acquired tastes. Initially, we might find caviar, roquefort cheese, habanero salsa, or scotch whiskey to be distasteful, but with exposure, and over time, we eventually develop a palate for them and seek them out.

  5. SuddenWorld.com » Acquiring Tasteson 06 Jan 2008 at 10:54 am

    […] picky eater is a sign of a closed mind”? I had mentioned in an earlier posting entitled “Always the Penumbra,” that just because one partakes in the cuisine of a given culture does not necessarily make one an […]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.