Archive for October, 2007

Oct 12 2007

Acquiring Tastes

Fruits and VegetablesMy mother used to say to me, “a picky eater is a sign of a closed mind.” Usually this pithy statement would accompany her attempts to compel my childhood self into overcoming my obstinate distaste for foods involving onions, fish, or Chinese cuisine in general.

The phrase also seemed to serve as an informal litmus test for her to assess the character of people in general whenever she had a chance to observe them eat. That didn’t bode well for a significant portion of the human population….

Back then, you’d sooner change water into wine than convince me to consume any form of the onion, be it served raw in a salad, fried with batter, diced into a stew or sauce, or grilled on a kebab.

In fact, it was not an uncommon ritual on spaghetti night with the Pontees when I would ask with all the petulant vehemence of an inquisition, “Are there any onions in this?” to which my mother would evenly reply, “No, there are no onions.” “Are you sure?” “Yes, positive.”

Being a precocious child cynic, I had always half-suspected that she was being less than forthcoming about the presence of onions despite her claims to the contrary, and it was only years later that I received full disclosure about spaghetti night: my mother would frequently mince onions to the point of textural oblivion in order to blend it into the sauce.

I’m happy to report that well into my adult years my tastes have evolved to the the point where it is unthinkable for me to neglect the use of sautéed onions in preparation of tomato sauce. I’ll even enjoy the occasional savory red onion in my panzanella salad.

Unfortunately, I’m not sure I can entirely credit my mother’s clandestine insurrection against my fascist taste buds. Being open to food, after all, requires voluntary choice. Point in fact, I actually recall the significant turning point for me on the stance of onions.

It was in my college years (yes, it took me that long to come around to onions) when I was first living in a private apartment after a freshman year in the dormitories. A fellow Korean American student had shown me a easy-to-make dinner in the way of broiling a briskly seasoned steak (salt, pepper, and garlic) with a few sliced onions thrown on top. Eating what was probably my own first attempt at cooking (outside of a home economics class way back in middle school), the meal turned out to be pretty tasty.

Perhaps this transformation of taste was due in part to a desire for something beyond the college cafeteria food experience and in part to the fact that this particular meal, onions included, involved the validation of personal choice and pride in personal initiative to prepare this dish.

What I took for granted as a child regarding the special effort that went into my mother’s cooking I could now only retroactively appreciate with this new hindsight, having joined the ranks of food preparation.

Fish is still a work in progress: I feel I don’t eat enough of it, although I have gotten better over the years. I hadn’t even acquired a taste for sashimi or sushi until my mid-twenties.

In that change I owe to a staff outing of teachers when I was teaching English in Seoul, South Korea. As the high school where I was a teacher was fitting the bill, I didn’t want to appear an ungracious guest and took a couple bracing swigs of soju (a strong Korean alcohol derived from potato and various grains that I would argue foregos taste in favor of simply trying to knock you flat on your face) and dug into my first round of sashimi, Japanese cuisine in the heart of South Korea.

I’ve been a convert ever since, and not necessarily with the stupor of an alcohol-induced fervor.

However, I don’t eat enough of fish in general, and I still have a lot of misgivings about shellfish. Why the clammy primordial residue of goo that constitutes oysters on the half-shell constitutes a delicacy still continues to allude me. And boiled mussels with their silent gaping mouths and orange-hued “tongues” seem to have a knack for making my stomach queasy.

As for my sadly misguided anti-Chinese food campaign, I think it must have been a phase I was going through when I was about ten years old. It’s embarrassing to recall, but I remember occasions where I insisted on stopping by McDonald’s before going into any Chinese restaurant. Egad, if I could just have five minutes with that kid of yesteryear…. Knowing better now, between a choice of McDonald’s and a good Chinese restaurant, the Chinese restaurant will win hands down every time.

However, I was gratified to know that I wasn’t alone among the ranks of finicky eaters. In “Picky Eaters? They Get It From You,” The New York Times article cites research that actually attributes 78% of our finickiness to genetics and 22% to environmental factors. Such a stark numerical breakdown hardly allows for the romance of taste, but it presents an interesting dilemma. If so much of our finickiness is genetically predisposed, how to we grow out of it?

Although a genetic component exists, it does not let us finicky eaters completely off the hook, as Patricia Pliner, a social psychology professor at the University of Toronto had reminded readers of the NYT article that biology is not destiny (my emphasis).

So how does this all relate back to that pithy, if seemingly ominous, phrase coined by my mother that “a picky eater is a sign of a closed mind”? I had mentioned in an earlier posting entitled “Always the Penumbra,” that just because one partakes in the cuisine of a given culture does not necessarily make one an ambassador to that culture, e.g., eating sushi or sashimi does not necessarily guarantee my sensitivity to Japanese culture as a whole.

But if we can introduce ourselves to new cultures through food, it is at least a good start, but it certainly shouldn’t be the final destination. Keeping an open mind to different cultures is about making choices that will expose one to new environments, new sensations, and new ways of thinking.

Speaking beyond just food in terms of cultural experiences, some experiences may be instantly enjoyable, others may be an acquired taste, while others still may yet be inaccessible or even unwanted, but at least the effort and intent are present. And for people to come around, sometimes it requires a little patience, i.e., if I can learn to eat onions, fish, and Chinese food, there may yet be hope in the world.

I would love to hear responses from readers about their own stories of heretofore unfamiliar or formerly unwanted foods or ethnic cuisines. What did you learn with the introduction of this new food as it pertains to the culture providing it, and more importantly, what did you learn about yourself?

4 comments so far

Oct 08 2007

Eye on Jackson Heights, NYC

If New York City has a reputation for being one of the most diverse places on the planet, then one could make a strong argument that its borough of Queens is a significant contributing factor.

Just take a look at this list below with a percentage breakdown by ethnicity of Queens relative to the other boroughs of New York City based on my findings within the State & County QuickFacts site of the U.S. Census Bureau. You’ll note that Queens has a more even distribution of major ethnic groups (the Census Bureau uses the term “race”) in the comparison among counties, i.e., boroughs).

New York City Data Set from US Census Bureau (2005)

Queens County (Queens Borough)

  • White : 55.1%
  • Black : 21.1%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native : 0.7%
  • Asian : 20.9%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander : 0.1%
  • Persons reporting two or more races : 2.1%
  • Persons of Hispanic or Latino : 26.1%
  • White persons not Hispanic : 31.7%

New York County (Manhattan Borough)

  • White : 66.5%
  • Black : 19.8%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native : 0.7%
  • Asian : 10.7%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander : 0.1%
  • Persons reporting two or more races : 2.2%
  • Persons of Hispanic or Latino : 25.9%
  • White persons not Hispanic : 47.7%

Bronx County (Bronx Borough)

  • White : 49.6%
  • Black : 42.5%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native : 1.2%
  • Asian : 3.4%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander : 0.5%
  • Persons reporting two or more races : 2.8%
  • Persons of Hispanic or Latino : 51.3%
  • White persons not Hispanic : 13.1%

Kings County (Brooklyn Borough)

  • White : 50.6%
  • Black : 38.3%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native : 0.5%
  • Asian : 8.9%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander : 0.1%
  • Persons reporting two or more races :1.5%
  • Persons of Hispanic or Latino : 9.9%
  • White persons not Hispanic : 35.6%

Richmond County (Staten Island Borough)

  • White : 80.3%
  • Black : 10.8%
  • American Indian and Alaska Native : 0.3%
  • Asian : 7.2%
  • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander : 0.1%
  • Persons reporting two or more races : 1.3%
  • Persons of Hispanic or Latino : 14.6%
  • White persons not Hispanic : 67.9%

If you’re wondering why the numbers don’t add up to a 100%, the Census Bureau considers the designation of “Hispanic” to potentially belong to any race, so it is included in applicable race categories. Also, certain respondents reported to more than one race category.

Why do I bring all of this up, and single out Queens in particular? Well, I sometimes come across the perception, either overt or unconscious, from residents and visitors alike, that Manhattan is synonymous with the name New York City. It obscures the fact that Manhattan is just one of five boroughs that make up New York City.

Granted, Manhattan is a rather impressive chunk of island real estate. It is a juggernaut engine for the arts, culture, finance, cuisine, and real estate, but its energy derives not just from within but from the surrounding denizens of the tri-state area that commute in and out every day like a million pistons (not to mention people from all over the world). To extend upon the venerable poet and preacher John Donne’s phrasing “no man is an island,” I would further compound that no island is truly an island…figuratively speaking.

And yet still, some ostensibly worldly Manhattanites have been known to refer to those residents who must commute into “the city” (in pursuit of diversion or duty ) with the pejorative term “the bridge and tunnel crowd” (bridge and tunnels being the primary means of access to the island of Manhattan from the surrounding area).

It smacks of specious elitism at best, ugly bigotry at worst. Those who use the phrase might claim it is a distinction of class rather than ethnicity; but in our social reality, they often sadly become one and the same—and really, are such prejudices on either ground a remotely palatable humanistic outlook?

At the other extreme, I’ve had young students from more socioeconomically challenged neighborhoods throughout NYC take pride in a certain “street cred” that derives from claiming to hail from certain neighborhoods in the boroughs of Bronx, Manhattan, and Brooklyn. I was amused though slightly chagrined to learn that no such cool factor was afforded to any resident of either Queens or Staten Island, although I would wager there were very different reasons for these two boroughs.

Part of the identity of Queens owes itself to a substantial immigrant culture, and State Island is just very very white (refer back to the statistics above). But in my students’ delineation of what’s cool and what’s not by localized boundaries, they draw a curious parallel to the perceptions of those Manhattan elite who deride those from the “outer” boroughs (and New Jersey). They have bought into the myth of their own locality, not considering that other neighborhoods may offer something of unique cultural value.

New York City is a glorious manifestation of people from a dizzying array of socioeconomic, professional, and cultural backgrounds. What would you have if you cut off the boroughs from one another and the surrounding tri-state area? Well, eventually, on a literal level, you would get starving populations slowly becoming mired in their own accumulated squalor, excepting the Bronx which is the only borough contiguous with the U.S. mainland.

But the states of hunger and squalor operate figuratively in terms of a dearth in cultural diversity and in terms of moral obsolescence respectively. Every community has something to offer, which is why I will do my best to write an ongoing segment devoted to my own neighborhood, Jackson Heights, Queens, arguably one of the most diverse neighborhoods in the United States, if not the world.

Jackson Heights fascinates me as a paradigm for those marginalized in their multiculturalism, just as Manhattan to me often represents a high order of status and power that sometimes forget the little guys that work so hard make it look so good.

In Jackson Heights, you will find in the span of roughly .8 square miles a panoply of ethnic cultures. From the Asian demographic comes immigrants from Bangladesh, China, Korea, India, Pakistan, and the Philippines; from the European demographic comes multigenerational descendents of Irish, Jewish, Italian, Polish, and Russian heritage; and from the Latino demographic comes immigrants from Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Uruguay. There is also a distinctive pocket in the way of a gay community amidst this huddle of immigrants.

Given the wealth of material stemming from this paradigm for the United States, a country built on immigration, I’m sure I’ll find plenty to relay in the future in keeping my eye on Jackson Heights.

 

4 comments so far

Oct 01 2007

A Dissent in Description: Satrapi’s Iran Is Its People

Persepolis: The Story of a ChildhoodThe Summary Report:
Marjane Satrapi has created a graphic memoir, essentially an autobiography in comics form, that recalls her childhood during the Iranian Revolution.

The Demographic Report:
This work is for mature readers who have only known Iran and its people through the homogenizing effects of mass media, giving readers an alternate insider’s viewpoint. Those who enjoy personal memoirs or history pertaining to Middle Eastern affairs should pick this up.

The Minority Report:
This book gives voice to a perspective not common to general American discourse, i.e., a little Iranian girl who knows how to speak for herself.

The Review:
In Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood, Marjane Satrapi has written and illustrated a personalized account of growing up in Iran that provides a refreshing counterpoint to the often slick pedantry of alarmist cultural profiling that major cable news networks love to feed the American public. Satrapi herself had stated that her graphic memoir grew out of that very need to provide Iran with a more intimate narrative distinct from the unilaterally negative stories that have served as the Western world’s public image of Iran.

This is not to say she indulges in the saccharine and sanitized demeanor of tourist-trap literature—far from it. Her recollections of growing up under the politically oppressive regime of the 1979 Iranian Revolution engenders sometimes sad, sometimes tender, sometimes funny, sometimes chilling, but always compelling moments born out the intersection of her private and public life. The people of Iran, rather than becoming documentary subjects, become humanized through her telling, particularly because she is so generous in giving voice to each “character” with a life distinct from her own.

And with her own voice, she rewards her readers with an unapologetic portrayal of her own precocious childhood, infused with a dizzying concoction of charm, wonder, and yes, even the occasional pettiness that are the hallmarks of childhood development. Some of the most profound moments arise from the discomfiting invasions of a more brutal reality into her childhood musings.

Case in point, she had learned as a child from her father’s friend, a former political prisoner, that the seemingly benign household items like the iron could also be used as an instrument of torture. While she allows the character of her childhood to feel the appropriate shock and sympathy for her father’s friend, she doesn’t hesitate to portray the quirky egocentricities of a child that wishes that she could brag about her own father being tortured as a kind of political martyr.

Ms. Satrapi’s style of drawing opts for a storybook appearance rather than realism, which frames the feelings and intentions of each person that become immediate to the reader. This comes at the cost of providing detailed settings that could locate us more vividly in the Iran she knew. However, this is ultimately forgivable, since her interest lies more in the people than the place itself. In fact, her framed illustrations resemble the wide-eyed bas-reliefs and sculptures familiar to ancient Mesopotamian culture, which also seem to boldly announce personhood.

Throughout her book one finds such evidence that Ms. Satrapi seeks grounding in her Persian cultural forebears. Even the title Persepolis refers to the ceremonial capital of ancient Persia, most tellingly burned and pillaged by the incursion of Alexander the Great in 331 B.C. In light of contemporary representations of Iran by the West, Satrapi provides an apt metaphor in the ruins of Persepolis. More pointed is the fact that “Persepolis” is the Greek name that remains extant while the Persian wording Parsa remains little used, at least for Westerners. Perhaps it also serves paradoxically as her homage to the West, which provided her the means to express what her own government would likely condemn.

It is a difficult task to reclaim labels perpetrated by the more powerful, whether one’s own government or foreign powers, but Ms. Satrapi has followed her artistic vision with the moral dedication to resist such monolithic forces. This is the reader’s chance to know a nation not by rhetoric or rote, but by a conscientious woman with a story to tell about real people.

Product Details:

  • Title: Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood
  • Author: Marjane Satrapi (writer/illustrator)
  • Paperback: 160 pages
  • Publisher: Pantheon (June 1, 2004)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 037571457X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0375714573
  • Product Dimensions: 9 x 6 x 0.7 inches

One comment so far

« Prev